Product page
Explains what the product is, who it is for, and why it exists.
Pages
1
Cited
2
State
OK
Keep the product page consistent with the claims assistants cite.
Appointment scheduling and patient reminder software for small clinics.
Current diagnosis
/ May 28, 2026VisitDesk has partial AI visibility, but the signal is not strong enough yet.
Cited by assistants
51%
Known by name
89%
Top rival
SimplyBook.me · 7
What to do next
Priority: close the weakest gap first: recognition, discovery, sources, or competitor pressure.
Direct recognition
Asked by name
Category visibility
“Best tools like this”
Problem visibility
Buyer describes the pain
Competitor pressure
FlatSimplyBook.me
7 mentions in the latest answers
Assistant coverage
Source influence
Which source groups assistants lean on right now.
What needs attention
Discovery gap
-2 pts34%
Blind category answers that still miss you
Competitor pressure
SimplyBook.me
7 mentions in latest answers
Owned source share
30%
7 of 23 source groups are yours
AI content map
Green pages are already cited. Amber pages exist but need stronger proof. Red pages are missing.
Product page
Explains what the product is, who it is for, and why it exists.
Pages
1
Cited
2
State
OK
Keep the product page consistent with the claims assistants cite.
Pricing
Answers buying and budget questions without forcing AI to guess.
Pages
1
Cited
1
State
OK
Keep pricing details current because assistants already have a citeable page.
Alternatives
Captures buyers comparing you against known options.
Pages
0
Cited
0
State
Fix
Create alternatives coverage for competitor-shaped buyer searches.
Comparisons
Gives AI a fair owned source when buyers ask who to choose.
Pages
1
Cited
1
State
OK
Publish a clear Acuity Scheduling comparison
Use cases
Matches problem-led prompts where buyers describe the pain first.
Pages
2
Cited
1
State
OK
Keep expanding use-case pages around new missed buyer prompts.
Integrations
Shows where the product fits in the buyer's existing stack.
Pages
1
Cited
0
State
Fix
Add setup, compatibility, and workflow proof to integration pages.
Docs
Gives assistants technical proof that the product is real and usable.
Pages
1
Cited
0
State
Fix
Make docs easier to navigate and connect them to buyer questions.
FAQ / objections
Answers objections, edge cases, and pre-sales questions directly.
Pages
0
Cited
0
State
Fix
Add FAQ or objection-handling pages for common buyer doubts.
Action plan
Assistants understand VisitDesk by name, but miss it when buyers ask how to reduce no-shows and automate appointment reminders.
Acuity Scheduling appears in comparison answers. VisitDesk needs a direct page explaining fit, tradeoffs, pricing, and clinic-specific workflows.
Assistants cite third-party clinic software lists that mention competitors but do not mention VisitDesk yet.
This reduced the discovery gap by giving assistants clearer evidence about pricing, reminders, and clinic integrations.
AI Site Readiness
Good means AI can read your site. Weak means there are too few pages it can actually quote.
Readiness
Citation evidence is uneven
First fix
Answer coverage
Strengthen owned clinic scheduling pages so assistants can cite the product directly.
robots.txt keeps public pages crawlable
llms.txt exists but needs stronger clinic workflow links
Homepage metadata is mostly clear, but needs stronger product, category, or problem signals.
Canonical URL points to the owned homepage
Product schema exists but pricing and offer data are thin
The sitemap exposes owned pages, but AI discovery coverage can still improve.
Most buyer pages are crawlable, but coverage is not complete yet.
Product identity is mostly consistent, but some surfaces still need alignment.
No-show reminders and clinic comparison answers need depth
Pages assistants can cite
15 pagesProgress
Visibility snapshots
30
Daily over the last 30 days
Score now
+19 pts in 30d43/100
Latest AI visibility score
Coverage now
+32 pts51%
Answers that mention you
Site readiness
+33 pts74/100
How citable your site is
Visibility is climbing
+19 ptsThe AI visibility score improved across the sample monitoring window.
Coverage expanded
+32 ptsMore assistant answers mention the product when buyers ask relevant questions.
Rival pressure eased
-12The top rival shows up less often, which makes the improvement feel visible.
Visibility momentum
Score, assistant coverage, and buyer visibility, day by day.
Competitor pressure
Action progress
Open
2
WIP
1
Done
1
AI site readiness
Project evolution
| Date | Score | Coverage | Buyer visibility | Top rival | Open actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | 430 | 51% | 66% | SimplyBook.me (7) | 6 |
| May 27, 2026 | 430 | 51% | 64% | SimplyBook.me (7) | 6 |
| May 26, 2026 | 430 | 51% | 62% | SimplyBook.me (8) | 7 |
| May 25, 2026 | 43-1 | 52% | 59% | SimplyBook.me (10) | 7 |
| May 24, 2026 | 44-1 | 53% | 56% | SimplyBook.me (11) | 7 |
| May 23, 2026 | 450 | 54% | 53% | SimplyBook.me (13) | 7 |
| May 22, 2026 | 450 | 54% | 50% | SimplyBook.me (14) | 8 |
| May 21, 2026 | 45+1 | 54% | 48% | SimplyBook.me (15) | 8 |
| May 20, 2026 | 44+1 | 53% | 47% | SimplyBook.me (15) | 8 |
| May 19, 2026 | 43+1 | 51% | 46% | Acuity Scheduling (15) | 8 |
| May 18, 2026 | 42+2 | 48% | 46% | Acuity Scheduling (15) | 9 |
| May 17, 2026 | 40+3 | 45% | 46% | Acuity Scheduling (14) | 9 |
| May 16, 2026 | 37+2 | 42% | 47% | Acuity Scheduling (13) | 9 |
| May 15, 2026 | 35+2 | 38% | 48% | Acuity Scheduling (13) | 9 |
| May 14, 2026 | 33+2 | 35% | 48% | Acuity Scheduling (12) | 10 |
| May 13, 2026 | 31+1 | 32% | 48% | Acuity Scheduling (12) | 10 |
| May 12, 2026 | 300 | 30% | 47% | Acuity Scheduling (12) | 10 |
| May 11, 2026 | 30+1 | 29% | 46% | Acuity Scheduling (12) | 10 |
| May 10, 2026 | 29-1 | 29% | 44% | Acuity Scheduling (13) | 11 |
| May 9, 2026 | 300 | 29% | 41% | Acuity Scheduling (14) | 11 |
| May 8, 2026 | 30-1 | 30% | 39% | Calendly (15) | 11 |
| May 7, 2026 | 31-1 | 31% | 36% | Calendly (17) | 11 |
| May 6, 2026 | 320 | 31% | 33% | Calendly (18) | 12 |
| May 5, 2026 | 320 | 32% | 30% | Calendly (19) | 12 |
| May 4, 2026 | 32+1 | 31% | 28% | Calendly (20) | 12 |
| May 3, 2026 | 31+1 | 30% | 27% | Calendly (21) | 12 |
| May 2, 2026 | 30+2 | 28% | 26% | Calendly (21) | 13 |
| May 1, 2026 | 28+2 | 26% | 26% | Calendly (20) | 13 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | 26+2 | 22% | 26% | Calendly (20) | 13 |
| Apr 29, 2026 | 24 | 19% | 27% | Calendly (19) | 13 |